Issue #8

Fall 2004

The Basin Bulletin

Newsletter for Stakeholders of the Raritan Basin Watershed


Winter Road Maintenance Operations Seminar  

In late October, New Jersey Water Supply Authority (NJWSA) partnered with the Public Works Association of New Jersey (PWANJ) and The Salt Institute to present “Winter Maintenance Operations” to over 170 Public Works employees. This workshop is one of the ways that NJWSA is working to reduce non-point source pollution as part of the Targeted Watershed Grant that we received along with Stony-Brook Millstone Watershed Association from the US EPA.  Additional grant partners include the South Branch Watershed Association and the NJ Department of Environmental Protection.  NJWSA wants to ensure that everyone has access to the latest information about safely maintaining roads during the winter in a cost effective way that minimizes the impact on the environment. 

The half-day course was held in Camden County on October 26, 2004 and in Somerset County the following day.  Dan Van Abs, Manager of NJWSA’s Watershed Protection Unit, introduced the seminar with an explanation of the effect of de-icing materials on water quality in the Raritan Basin and beyond.  Paul McCall, Supervisor of Somerset County Roads and Bridges, acted as moderator and gave a presentation on plowing equipment and techniques. Dick Hanneman, President of The Salt Institute, was the featured speaker. 

Hanneman stressed the efficient use of salt and other ice removal chemicals.  He explained the advantages and disadvantages of different types of chemicals and abrasives, how they work, how to determine their application rates, and their storage needs.  Hanneman emphasized anti-icing, regularly calibrating spreaders, and using pre-wet or liquid chemicals as three ways to ensure the most effective use of materials.

Anti-icing is the proactive practice of spreading material (Sodium Chloride, Calcium Chloride, Magnesium Chloride, Calcium Magnesium Acetate, etc.) before a storm to prevent snow and ice from bonding to the road.  It is more efficient than the reactive practice of de-icing during or after a storm.  Waiting until after a storm has started to begin applying material allows snow and ice to bond to the road.  Once this has occurred, it takes more material and time to break the bond and achieve melting.  Anti-icing can reduce chemical use by 50 to 80%. 

A lot of effort goes into determining the appropriate application rates for different conditions, but that effort could be wasted if the spreaders are not calibrated.  While spreaders come factory calibrated, they should be re-calibrated at least once a year.  Ideally, the calibration should be checked two or three times each winter.  One course participant pointed out that after calibrating his spreader, he realized that he had been putting twice the amount of salt on the road as he had intended.  This wastes money and resources and puts an unnecessary strain on the environment.  The opposite can happen as well, leading to a situation where not enough material is reaching the roadway.  This could become a liability if the road conditions cause an accident. 

There are a few reasons why pre-wetted salt or brine are recommended over granular salt in many conditions.   Pre-wetted salt and brine have less bounce and scatter and a faster reaction time than granular salt, which means less salt is needed to do the job.  One Michigan Highway Department study found that 78% of pre-wetted salt stayed on the center third of a roadway, while only 46% of dry salt stayed in the center.  In addition to staying on the road, pre-wetted salt and brine work more quickly than granular salt because salt needs to dissolve into solution before melting can occur. 

These key messages were well received by the Public Works employees who attended the classes.  Forty-three percent of the post-program surveys indicated that participants intend to change their practices because of the course.  The most common expected change is to add anti-icing to their operations.  The calibration message also proved to be important.  Only 40% of the participants said that they currently calibrate their spreaders.  Forty-eight percent do not currently calibrate and 12% left the question blank.  The popularity of the courses and the reactions of the participants demonstrated that there is a continuing need to provide similar educational opportunities.

Back to Basin Bulletin